RMS on why Emacs lisp doesn't have namespace

浏览数：32 / 时间：2015年06月20日

Re: Generators (iterators) for Gnu Emacs

From:	Richard Stallman
Subject:	Re: Generators (iterators) for Gnu Emacs
Date:	Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:59:22 -0500

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden‘s example. ]]]

  > I wonder whether perhaps Richard ran into the need to use prefixes
  > so much because he was implementing the CL package system, and not
  > just making normal use of it.  Just a conjecture.

I implemented all the Common Lisp features (of which the package
system was one) in the Lisp Machine operating system, which included
lots of programs to do lots of things.  (An Emacs-like editor was one
of them.)

In practice, the goal of using names without prefixes via importing
namespace did not work out.

I make the conjecture that name space importing is convenient when you
have lots of small modules, each with its own name space and not many
names, and each referring to just a few other modules.  That‘s not how
the Lisp Machine system was written, and it‘s also mostly not how
Emacs was written.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org  www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That‘s nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
  Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.

郑重声明：本站内容如果来自互联网及其他传播媒体，其版权均属原媒体及文章作者所有。转载目的在于传递更多信息及用于网络分享，并不代表本站赞同其观点和对其真实性负责，也不构成任何其他建议。

RMS on why Emacs lisp doesn't have namespace